data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/613d6/613d6925ea321604fe6e3acd4a1d26fd265c77ba" alt=""
In any case, last year I badly needed some
new boots for my trip to Borneo as the seams had exploded on my Lowa Renegades
near the toe box. I initially went to
MEC and got some Salomon 4D GTX boots.
They looked like good sturdy boots and would be very comfortable, but
when I got home, I started thinking about them more, and they were just massive
and overkill for what I need. They are
the same weight as my renegades, higher rise and looked like they would be
quite hot when walking around the jungles and streets of Kota Kinabalu or the
jungles. They look like they would be
good for heavy duty expeditions with high backpack loads but that’s not what I
needed.
I went back to MEC to
return the Salomon 4D boots and got some Keen Gypsum boots because that was
almost the only thing they had in the range I needed and my size. I have found these to be not too bad. They are still heavy with a good amount of needless
leather in the uppers, and too much ankle padding. The lace design also makes it difficult to
cinch the boots firmly to my foot for some reason. There are some good things - the toebox is
large and my feet don’t feel cramped. My
main reason for needing to get new boots is that the 10.5 size is slightly too
short for my feet and hammer my big toes.
In fact the toenails on both my big toes don’t grow properly any more
from years of smashing my toes on the front of my ski boots and hiking boots. In any case, I need new boots this year.
The range of boots on the market has
literally exploded recently and is very confusing to anyone buying a boot/shoe
for outdoor use. There’s everything from
barefoot hiking shoes to expedition mountaineering boots. The area of the light hikers/trail runners
has seen the most growth, but I still can’t tell the difference between some
models even offered by the same company, some look exactly the same. I just thought of, and looked for what I
needed in a boot.
I have strong ankles, so support really
isn’t needed much for myself. I prefer
to have a GTX liner – true, open mesh breathes much, much better, but I don’t
want to be tiptoeing around muddy areas on the trail like a princess or else
getting a muddy soaker. I do like a
higher boot to keep out sand and pebbles out of my shoe, and also increase the
soaker resistant depth for water crossings.
A slightly higher boot also reduced banging my ankle on rocks as I make
my way through rocky areas. I want
something light, that does not have a leather upper - as I mentioned earlier leather uppers are
unnecessarily heavy, and they don’t dry quick either. I also didn’t want those thin quick laces as
seen on many runners nowadays, I don’t trust them for multi day hikes. This blog entry from Freelance Trekker isn't a fan of them at all. I also want proper
laces so I can tie them tight for downhills.
So, I ended up with the
Salomon X-Ulta Mid GTX. A light runner
like shoe/boot hybrid with minimal leather in the upper, small toe cap and a
slightly higher upper than a runner, and a waterproof breathable GTX
liner. Perfect… I think. As always,
I look forward to testing my new piece of gear and will report back for a
longer term test after I get some use out of them.
Links:
I am slowly transitioning my gear to be lighter weight where it makes sense. I am not an ultralight nut, but even when I was a kid, I wondered ... salomongtx.blogspot.de
ReplyDelete